Monthly Archives: June 2011


Economic Growth Theory: a breakthrough by Peter Belohlavek

Peter Belohlavek’s research demonstrated that economic growth is produced when there is an increase of technology, scarcity, monetary circulation and competitiveness in an environment. This growth theory is applicable to micro and macroeconomics. The Unicist standard defined the objects that are necessary to be upgraded in order to foster economic growth. The driver for growth is the increase of monetary circulation but its catalyst is competitiveness. Apprehending the concept of economic growth allows designing growth strategies.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


The Ontology of Wealth and Poverty

The purpose of wealth is to foster evolution to guarantee the opportunities for the next generations. Wealth/Social evolution depends on the working capacity limited by the social and institutional inertia of a culture.

Operationally, wealth depends on the working capacity, the technology, the education and the inertia of a culture. Poverty as such doesn’t exist. Poverty implies the absence of Wealth.

That is why it is commonly seen in underdeveloped countries that there are organizations who promote the “combat of poverty”.

You can combat thieves because they exist, you can combat enemies, but you cannot combat poverty. What you need to increase is wealth. The combat of poverty is just a fallacious myth to justify the distribution of an existing wealth.

The production of wealth must be fostered to reduce poverty. Combating poverty produces more poverty.

Poor countries have no power, because their working capacity is extremely low, that is why they are poor.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


Functionality of the knowledge of the history of Countries

Historical research has achieved its goal if a real awareness of a culture has been apprehended in order to influence the environment. Historical research has been used more as an ideological support methodology than as tool to sustain human evolution.

Countries are human complex adaptive systems and as such there is no possibility of making researches from the “outside”. Observers are part of the system but need to have learned to deal with “culture blindness” (What is normal or self-evident cannot be perceived).

The research of historical evolution has been driven by the dialectic approach. On the one hand Hegel’s idealistic dialectic and on the other hand Marx’s materialistic dialectic.

The Marxist materialistic model gave a final push to historical subjectivism by introducing an over-simplified research method. Its success was that everybody, from teenagers to seniors, felt that they could interpret reality making it appear as what they needed to see.

Marxist logic was and is indestructible in the field of wishful thinking. That is why it was a source of utopias. In spite of this fact, the Marxist approach as a dualistic way of thinking was an upgrade to the preexisting intuitive historical models.

On the other hand Hegel’s idealistic dialectic approach remained in the field of complexity.

Unicist double dialectical model is what allows apprehending the nature of a culture. The double dialectic follows the rules of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature that regulate the evolution.

We invite you to be our guest at the Unicist Library to learn about “The Unicist Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature”:
http://www.unicist.com/futureresearch/

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is a pioneer in complexity science research. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution, including the development of ontology based and business object driven solutions for businesses.


A breakthrough in Social Sciences

The major breakthrough of the Unicist Ontology applied to Social Sciences is based on the discovery made by Peter Belohlavek of the ontological structure of the social archetypes and their rules of evolution, and the finding of the cross-cultural “invariables” and their laws of evolution.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


The functionality of Taboos in Social Evolution

The purpose of a taboo is to avoid destruction. Those who do not respect the taboos of a culture endanger the cultural survival, growth or identity. Therefore disregarding the taboos produces self-destruction and/or destruction.

Functionally, taboos provide a secure social environment to allow and foster actions and a secure individual environment to avoid uncertainty.

The paradox is that evolving cultures respect the taboos that are usually implicit in their protocols or rituals to prepare actions while involving cultures do not respect them.

Action requires preexisting protocols that are strictly respected in evolving cultures.

Involving cultures, on the other hand, lack protocols or generate protocols that produce fallacious myths. This means that the protocols disregard the taboos and foster non acceptable actions that degrade the culture.

At an essential operational level, the functionality of taboos requires the integration of the structuring of a secure social and individual environment based on extremely strict rules with a punishment system that includes both social and self-inflicted punishment.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


Unicist Ontology for Object driven Scenario Building

The Unicist Standard to deal with the Nature of Nations developed by Peter Belohlavek describes the fundamentals and taxonomies that need to be used in order to manage Country Future Research. It includes the structures of the Unicist Archetypes, of the Drivers for Social, Economic and Political Behavior and of the Power of Nations.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


35th Anniversary of The Unicist Research Institute

June 1976 was the beginning of the research of evolution in the field of complexity science. It was focused on approaching the nature of reality which required an ontological approach to the basic research and an object driven approach in the field of application.

The research drove to the discovery of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature, the unicist ontology, the unicist logic, the complexity science research methodology and the human ontointelligence.

This provided the basic knowledge to develop more than 3,500 applicative researches in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution that were finished until September 2010. The research work is still ongoing.

We would like to share with you this celebration giving you access to the book on:

Unicist Ethics: The Ethics of Doers

We consider it will allow you to expand your boundaries in work and businesses.

You can access the book at: http://www.unicist.org/deb_doers.php

This anniversary is a very special one, because it follows a turning point in our global expansion that took place during the last year.

Executive Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,500 ontological researches in complexity sciences, developed since 1976 until September 2010, applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Ontology of Evolution.