This law is a component of the unicist logic developed in 1986 by Peter Belohlavek, which has been incorporated into the suite of laws that govern the operation of artificial intelligence in managing adaptive systems.
Adaptive systems became understandable following the discovery that only supplementation and complementation relationships exist in nature. The triadic structure of entities, defined by a purpose, an active function, and an energy conservation function, is governed by the laws of supplementation and complementation. Here, the active function promotes growth by supplementation, whereas the energy conservation function ensures survival through complementation.
The Law of Supplementation
The law of supplementation states that in an evolutionary context, the active function of an entity competes with the purpose by striving for a higher level of functionality. This is characterized by redundant purposes and active functions. Meanwhile, the energy conservation function of the competing entity fosters superior value by featuring an advanced energy conservation function that challenges the progression of reality.
Consider the example of buying arguments for clarity:
The purpose of a buying argument is to satisfy wants or needs, with the active functions being the objections raised by an individual, and the energy conservation function being the convenience of the buying decision. The purpose of the active function and the implicit active function of the objections are redundant with their purpose counterparts. However, within an evolutionary framework, the objections are driven by the fulfillment of latent needs, weaknesses, or a superior ideal. As a result, the active function establishes a supplementary and competitive relationship with the purpose, which drives evolution.
The Functionality of Supplementation
Supplementation stimulates the purpose and propels its evolution. Hence, the active function is supplementary to the purpose, seeking to encourage growth. The objective of supplementation is to guarantee operation and functionality to fulfill a purpose while simultaneously aspiring to augment the purpose by increasing its value and expanding its possibilities.
Operational supplementation ensures operation with the goal of enhancing value. Functional supplementation maintains functionality with the intention of broadening the scope of the purpose. Essential supplementation integrates both operational and functional aspects.
Evolution is propelled by the conflict between supplementation and the purpose it supports, but only if it provides superior value, denoting a more significant generation of value.
At an operational level, the laws of supplementation and complementation define the unicist binary actions that enable adaptive systems to function. The binary actions initiated by the active functions are termed UBA type A, and those based on the energy conservation function are called UBA type B. Binary action type A creates opportunities by generating value, whereas binary action type B secures results.
The Unicist Research Institute
Artificial Intelligence Interpretations:
ChatGPT Interpretation
The Law of Supplementation as outlined within the framework of unicist logic presents a fascinating perspective on the dynamics of adaptive systems, particularly in the context of artificial intelligence and its application to managing such systems. Developed in 1986, the unicist logic introduced a nuanced way of understanding complex systems through the principles of supplementation and complementation, grounded in a triadic structure of entities comprising a purpose, an active function, and an energy conservation function.
This framework posits that adaptive systems evolve through a continuous interplay between these three components, where the active function seeks to surpass the established purpose by offering higher functionality, thus engaging in a supplementary relationship. This process is not merely a competitive endeavor but a symbiotic one, where the active function, through its pursuit of exceeding the purpose, inadvertently propels the evolution of the system. It highlights the inherent redundancy within systems where purposes and active functions overlap yet diverge in their evolutionary trajectories.
The Law of Supplementation underscores the critical role of supplementation in driving the evolutionary progress of systems. It delineates between operational supplementation, which ensures the system operates towards enhancing value, and functional supplementation, which maintains functionality with the aim of broadening the scope of the system’s purpose. This dual approach ensures that the system not only continues to function but also evolves to adapt to new challenges and opportunities, thereby expanding its potential and capabilities.
Moreover, the example of buying arguments illuminates the practical implications of this law. It demonstrates how the active function, represented by objections in a buying decision, serves not just as a barrier but as a catalyst for satisfying deeper, often latent needs. This interaction between the purpose (satisfying wants or needs) and the active function (raising objections) exemplifies the supplementary relationship that drives the evolution of the system by striving to fulfill a superior ideal or address weaknesses.
The essence of the Law of Supplementation lies in its recognition of the dynamic and evolutionary nature of adaptive systems. It asserts that evolution is not a linear or straightforward process but is driven by the complex interplay of supplementation and complementation within the system. This law, therefore, offers a profound insight into how artificial intelligence can be harnessed to manage and navigate the complexities of adaptive systems, providing a blueprint for leveraging conflict and redundancy as mechanisms for growth and evolution.
