Unicist Double Dialectics: The Intelligence that Governs Living Beings and Natural or Artificial Adaptive Entities


The Unicist Double Dialectics is the intelligence underlying the functionality of all entities in the real world, ranging from subatomic particles to the universe. It operates through the use of unicist binary actions and applies universally to living beings, inanimate entities, and artificial adaptive systems.

The confirmation of the functionality of the Higgs boson revealed the physical mechanism that introduces double dialectical behavior into the universe, enabling the generation of mass through symmetry breaking and structuring the existence of matter.

This interaction allows particles to acquire identity and integrate into functional systems, establishing the foundational logic that governs the dynamics of the microcosm.

Unicist double dialectics is the functional structure that makes life possible. It defines the ontogenetic intelligence of nature, which regulates the interaction of the elements that drive the functionality of living beings, and also applies to adaptive artificial entities.

It establishes the essential structure of all self-organized systems that interact with their environment through their binary actions. The knowledge of double dialectics enables access to the root causes inherent in the functionality of adaptive entities. The research on this subject was conducted under the leadership of Peter Belohlavek at The Unicist Research Institute.

Is the Unicist Double Dialectics the Origin of Life?

The emergence of life, what may be called the “Big Bang of Life”, can be hypothetically attributed to the moment when chemical elements, governed by physical laws, began to interact through structures that exhibited double dialectical behavior. This was the threshold where physics evolved into biology through the emergence of self-organized units with intrinsic purpose, thus enabling replication, energy absorption, and survival.

Whether the universe itself is an adaptive system remains an open question. While it is self-organizing and evolving, we do not yet know whether it has a purpose or belongs to a superior system that would make it adaptive in unicist terms.

In essence, the unicist double dialectics explains not only the existence of life but also the logic that underpins the functionality and evolution of any system that interacts adaptively with its context. It is the bridge between the deterministic world of physics and the purposeful world of life. In self-organized artificial adaptive systems, such as institutions, double dialectics provides the “artificial life” required for their evolution over time.

Synthesis

Unicist double dialectics is a universal intelligence that governs the unicist binary actions that drive the existence, evolution, and interaction of any adaptive system—physical, chemical, biological, social, or artificial. It is the intelligence that drives the functionality of living beings, enabling their survival and evolution.

The double dialectics defines that all actions of adaptive systems are binary and operationally complementary. The first action opens possibilities while generating a natural reaction; the second action complements the reaction, generating results without triggering further reactions.

Creation of the Unicist Ontogenetic Logic

Unicist Ontogenetic Logic was created to address the functionality and operation of adaptive systems, whether they are living beings or artificial entities. It encapsulates an emulation of nature’s ontogenetic intelligence and its underlying double dialectics.

This logic was developed to understand the intrinsic nature of adaptive systems, guiding the design and implementation of Unicist Binary Actions that ensure operability. It leverages the framework of Unicist Double Dialectics to comprehend and manage the unified field of adaptive entities.

The Functionality of Adaptive Systems

It is the intelligence that defines the functionality of adaptive systems—whether they are biological, social, or artificial. It explains the structure of systems that organize themselves around a purpose and interact with their environment to ensure both growth and survival.

This intelligence is not limited to the living world. It finds validation in the structure of atoms, which behave as adaptive systems by organizing their electrons in interaction with the environment. The functionalist principle of atoms defines that the protons represent the purpose, the electrons the active function, and the neutrons the energy conservation function.

The first binary action is the electromagnetic force that opens possibilities, while the strong nuclear force conserves energy, following the principle of the unicist double dialectics. This behavior not only confirms that atoms are essentially adaptive but also establishes a unified field that connects the micro- and macrocosm within physics.

This discovery led to the development of the unicist ontogenetic logic, which maps the structure and functionality of all adaptive systems. The double dialectics can be observed in the functionality of DNA. Together, A-T and C-G pairs follow the double dialectical functionality: A-T pairs proactively allow the replication fork’s progression, while C-G pairs ensure the continuity and accuracy of the replication process, following the principle of unicist double dialectics.

While further scientific research is needed to confirm its application at the subatomic level, the double dialectics and the unicist ontogenetic logic provide a comprehensive framework to understand and manage the functionality and evolution of all adaptive systems.

Unicist Double Dialectics: The Logic Behind Adaptive Systems

The unicist double dialectics is the intelligence that makes the existence of adaptive systems possible. It defines the structure and dynamics of any system that is both self-organized and integrated with an environment. These are the essential conditions for the existence of life—biological or artificial.

The term unicist indicates that the system operates as a unified field. In this unified field, the elements of a system do not act independently or linearly, but in a bi-univocal interdependence, where the whole and the parts influence each other in real time. This defines the ontogenesis of adaptive systems: the emergence of a dynamic, evolving entity through the interaction of its components within a specific environment.

An entity is considered self-organized when it has a purpose in itself. This purpose requires the integration of two intrinsic functions: an active function, which drives growth, and an energy conservation function, which ensures survival. These three elements—purpose, active function, and energy conservation function—define what is known as a functionalist principle.

The interaction of these elements follows the rules of the unicist double dialectics. This principle is grounded in the only two types of functional relationships that exist in adaptive systems:

  • Supplementarity, which drives the active function and creates the added value needed for evolution.
  • Complementarity, which drives the energy conservation function, ensures results and enables stability.

These dialectical interactions are operationalized through Unicist Binary Actions (UBAs), which are two synchronized actions that generate no reaction

  1. UBA A opens a pathway by triggering interaction with the environment and produces a reaction.
  2. UBA B responds to the environmental reaction and complements it to produce a functional result without generating further reactions.

What structure closes the circle of action-reaction. Unlike linear causality, where each reaction may trigger another action in an endless chain, a set of binary actions generates no further reactions. This reactionless functionality is what allows adaptive systems to exist, maintain coherence, and evolve.

The Fallacy of Marx and Hegel’s Dialectics

The Unicist Double Dialectics represents a fundamental shift from the traditional dialectical thinking proposed by Hegel and Marx. While rooted in the real world, it departs from philosophical abstractions and offers a concrete framework for understanding and managing the functionality, dynamics, and evolution of adaptive systems.

Unicist Double Dialectics

Unicist Double Dialectics focuses on integrating two Unicist Binary Actions (UBA a and UBA b) governed by a functionalist principle that ensures the  interplay of purpose, active function, and energy conservation function. This triadic structure reflects the natural functioning of adaptive entities, observable in phenomena like atoms, DNA, and real-world systems.

The use of conjunctions (“and”) over exclusive disjunctions (“or”), based on relationships of supplementation and complementation, define the interactions within adaptive systems. The approach transcends the transactional nature of conflict-driven processes, providing an accurate depiction of real-world dynamics where adaptive entities interact not through oppositions but through integrative relationships that drive sustainable evolution.

Hegel’s and Marx’s Dialectics

Hegel and Marx articulated traditional dialectics centered around thesis-antithesis-synthesis. This model emphasizes transactional processes and oppositions, generating a synthesis as a resolution of conflicts. Hegel focused on the realm of ideas, while Marx applied these principles to material behavior, using oppositions to describe evolutionary progress.

However, their approach offers only a rational framework detached from the inherent functionality of adaptive systems. By focusing on conflicts, these models introduce a fallacious understanding of evolution that overlooks the necessity of supplementation and complementation.

The Dysfunctionality of Traditional Dialectics

The opposition-centric model presented by Hegel and Marx, akin to individual UBAs, confines itself to rationality, distorting the real-world interactions that define adaptiveness. While Hegel’s dialectics aligns loosely with UBA B) and Marx’s with UBA A), the binary nature leads to an incomplete interpretation of systemic dynamics.

In essence, traditional dialectics misconstrues the genuine nature of evolutionary processes within adaptive systems by proposing that evolutionary progress stems from resolving transactional conflicts between opposites. This misalignment confines its applicability to metaphysical constructs rather than a true reflection of the real world.

Synthesis

The Unicist Double Dialectics provides a framework for understanding and managing real-world dynamics by aligning with the fundamental principles governing adaptive systems. It is based on functional integration, wherein adaptive entities interact through supplementation and complementation.

Unicist Double Dialectics in the Real World

Unicist double dialectics implies following a universal synchronicity. The active function comes first, as it is the most energy-consuming role, followed by the energy conservation function, which involves less energy expenditure.

Evident Examples of Unicist Double Dialectics

Double Dialectics of Learning + Teaching = Knowledge Acquisition
Knowledge acquisition begins with a need to learn, triggered by exposure to real problem-solving situations. This generates a form of uncertainty that is complemented by the teaching process, ensuring the acquisition of knowledge.

Double Dialectics of the Motor Nervous System + Sensory Nervous System = Human Action
Actions are activated by the motor nervous system, which generates a sensory reaction from the environment. This reaction is complemented by the sensory nervous system to ensure the functionality of the actions.

Double Dialectics of Productivity + Quality Assurance = Production
Production begins by establishing a productive process, which generates a reaction that demands quality. This is complemented by the quality assurance process to ensure the overall functionality of the productive process.

Double Dialectics of Marketing + Selling = Customer Generation
Customer generation begins with marketing efforts that position the attributes of products and services as first-choice alternatives. This triggers a need for tangible proposals, which is complemented by passive or active selling to ensure results.

Double Dialectics of Empathy + Sympathy = Influence Building
Influencing people starts with an empathic approach that enables understanding others. However, this often generates a non-conscious reaction of inaction, which is complemented through sympathy to effectively influence others.

Double Dialectics of Participation + Non-exerted Power = Leadership
Exercising leadership begins by fostering participation, which generates a reaction of influence directed at the leader. This is complemented by the leader’s non-exerted power, which ensures effective leadership.

Double Dialectics of Desirability + Harmony = Aesthetics
Aesthetics begins by making things desirable, which generates a reaction of surprise. This reaction is complemented by harmony within the aesthetic experience to ensure that it fulfills the counterpart’s expectations.

 Conclusion

The unicist double dialectics is the intelligence that underlies all functionality in self-organized adaptive systems. It orchestrates interactions through a universal synchronicity, where an active function opens a process and is complemented by an energy conservation function to ensure results. This principle governs diverse domains—from learning and leadership to marketing and production—by structuring binary actions that resolve complexity through functionality. Its application transforms the understanding and management of adaptive environments, enabling evolution through structured, purpose-driven interactions.

The Unicist Research Institute

Share

Country Archetypes Developed

• Algeria • Argentina • Australia • Austria • Belarus • Belgium • Bolivia • Brazil • Cambodia • Canada • Chile • China • Colombia • Costa Rica • Croatia • Cuba • Czech Republic • Denmark • Ecuador • Egypt • Finland • France • Georgia • Germany • Honduras • Hungary • India • Iran • Iraq • Ireland • Israel • Italy • Japan • Jordan • Libya • Malaysia • Mexico • Morocco • Netherlands • New Zealand • Nicaragua • Norway • Pakistan • Panama • Paraguay • Peru • Philippines • Poland • Portugal • Romania • Russia • Saudi Arabia • Serbia • Singapore • Slovakia • South Africa • Spain • Sweden • Switzerland • Syria • Thailand • Tunisia • Turkey • Ukraine • United Arab Emirates • United Kingdom • United States • Uruguay • Venezuela • Vietnam