Monthly Archives: May 2011


Is freedom or pseudo-freedom driving the outraged in Spain?

Thousands of people mobilized in a movement known as “the outraged” in cities around Spain. Is this driven by freedom or pseudo freedom?

…to oppose is easy
…to obey is simple
…to adapt is complex
…to be free is …..

We call Pseudo Freedom the anti-concept of Inner Freedom. Paradoxically, it appears as to be providing more freedom to individuals because it is driven by their beliefs and needs. Ordinary people consider they are free when they are able to confirm their beliefs and needs.

Pseudo Freedom can be defined as the integration of freewill decisions of individuals to satisfy their needs and beliefs. Individuals have no capacity to adapt to the environment when they are driven by needs or beliefs.

Individuals have no inner freedom but pseudo freedom when they need to do what they want. Paradoxically, fostering freewill decisions drives people towards “slavery”.

Both poverty and abundance foster pseudo freedom. Poverty generates pseudo freedom because extreme needs avoid that individuals make adapted decisions. Survivors cannot be free.

On the other hand, abundance implies the perception of winning and the need to sustain it. Thus, it is very difficult that inner freedom expands in an environment of abundance.

Inner freedom is based on the perception of scarcity.

Pseudo freedom is driven by stagnated social, individual and universal beliefs that establish the boundaries individuals cannot surpass. Thus they build parallel realities in order to confirm their personal freedom.

The need to exert power is the catalyst of pseudo freedom and stagnated spiritual needs is the entropy inhibitor to avoid inner freedom. The need to win exceeds the need to adapt to the environment.

Fundamentalists are paradigmatic examples of pseudo freedom.

You can access the ontology of inner freedom at:
http://www.unicist.org/deb_doers.php

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,500 researches in complexity science, developed since 1976 until September 2010, applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Ontology of Evolution.

Share

Unicist Tweetinar on Ontologies for Country Scenarios

The development of the ontological structure of country scenarios including the social, political, economic and technological scenario made scenario building possible.

It allowed the development of the ontological structure of democratic processes and its use in political scenarios and their evolution.

We invite you to participate in a Unicist Tweetinar with Peter Belohlavek on May 17 from 5:00 to 6:30 pm (New York Time) that includes the Unicist Ontologies for Political Scenarios. It will be developed at http://www.twitter.com/uniciststandard

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,500 researches in complexity science, developed since 1976 until September 2010, applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Ontology of Evolution.

Share