The Unicist Approach to Technological Evolution


Unicist future scenarios of technological evolution enable the definition of market possibilities for new technologies. Technologies are the active function of ideologies. Therefore, these scenarios facilitate the anticipation of the influence of technologies on the dominant ideologies of a society. Since ideologies are the energy conservation function of functional ethics, they also allow for the anticipation of the evolution of these ethics. This concept focuses on the interplay between technologies, ideologies, and ethics within a societal context, viewed through the lens of the unicist approach. 

  1. Technologies as the Active Function of Ideologies:
    • In this framework, technologies are not merely tools or systems but are seen as expressions or manifestations of prevailing ideologies within a society. Ideologies, which encompass the collective beliefs, values, and goals of a society, drive the creation and adoption of technologies that align with these values.
    • For instance, a society valuing efficiency and connectivity might foster advancements in communication technologies.

  2. Unicist Future Scenarios of Technological Evolution:
    • These scenarios are strategic tools used to anticipate how new technologies might evolve and how they will interact with current societal ideologies. They consider various potential future paths, assessing how technologies could reshape or reinforce societal norms and values.
    • Such scenarios are crucial for policymakers, businesses, and innovators as they provide a foresighted basis for decisions, ensuring alignment with potential future states of society.

  3. Dominant Ideologies and Their Evolution:
    • Ideologies are seen here as the “energy conservation function” of functional ethics in society. This implies that ideologies serve to preserve the core ethical values of a society, acting as a stabilizing force amid social and technological changes.
    • By analyzing how emerging technologies might interact with these ideologies, one can predict shifts or continuities in societal ethics. For example, the adoption of green technologies might be forecasted to strengthen ecological and sustainability ethics in societies currently valuing environmental conservation.

  4. Interplay Between Technologies and Ethics:
    • This concept suggests a bidirectional influence where not only do ideologies influence the creation and adoption of technologies, but new technologies can also reshape or redefine societal ideologies and, consequently, ethics.
    • The introduction of artificial intelligence in various sectors, for example, challenges existing ethical norms around privacy, employment, and decision-making, potentially leading to new ethical standards that accommodate these changes.

Overall, the concept underscores the importance of understanding the dynamic and reciprocal relationships between technology, ideology, and ethics. This understanding helps in crafting strategies that are not only technologically sound but also ethically and ideologically aligned with future societal values, thereby enhancing societal cohesion and ethical progress.

The Speed of Technological Adoption 

The unicist approach defines that the speed of technological adoption increases when it does not require changing habits, which affects the comfort zone of people, while satisfying their urgent needs. Intrinsically, the speed of adoption of technologies is defined by their relationship with preceding solutions. The more complementary they are, the faster they are adopted; the more they substitute previous technologies and require a different mindset, the slower the adoption occurs. Here’s a detailed analysis:

  1. Impact on Comfort Zones: Technologies that align with existing habits and fall within users’ comfort zones are more likely to be adopted quickly. People generally prefer to maintain their existing routines and ways of doing things. When a new technology requires minimal changes to these established patterns, it reduces resistance and facilitates a smoother transition.

  2. Satisfying Urgent Needs: The adoption speed also hinges on how well the new technology addresses immediate and pressing needs. If a technology provides a clear and compelling advantage or solves a significant problem without introducing substantial inconvenience, it is likely to be embraced more swiftly. This urgency acts as a catalyst for overcoming initial resistance to change.

  3. Relationship with Preceding Solutions: The concept of technologies being complementary versus substitutive is crucial. Complementary technologies enhance or improve existing solutions without displacing them, thus being integrated more easily into current systems and practices. For example, smartphone apps that offer additional functionalities for existing devices were quickly adopted because they enriched the user experience without requiring users to abandon familiar devices.

  4. Substitutive Technologies and Mindset Changes: On the other hand, technologies that act as substitutes often face slower adoption rates. If adopting a new technology means discarding previous solutions and learning new ways of interaction, it demands more from users in terms of time, effort, and psychological adaptation. The need to shift mindsets and perhaps even develop new skills can significantly slow down the adoption process.

The Functionality of Technological Scenarios

Unicist technological scenarios are always specific; their purpose is to anticipate the enhancement of the functionality of a function. The active function consists of supplementary aspects that replace previous solutions, and the energy conservation function comprises complementary aspects that support the enhancement of their functionality. Their gravitational force is the resolution of inherent weaknesses, and the catalyst for their introduction is the latent needs they satisfy.

The unicist approach to technological scenarios, focuses on their specificity and strategic purpose in enhancing particular functions within a system or process. 

  1. Specificity and Anticipation:
    • Unicist technological scenarios are designed to be highly specific, targeting the improvement of a distinct function within an organization or system. This specificity allows for more accurate forecasting and strategic planning, as scenarios are tailored to anticipated needs and potential developments within a narrow scope.
    • The primary purpose of these scenarios is to anticipate ways in which the functionality of a specific function can be enhanced, helping organizations stay ahead in technological adaptations and improvements.

  2. Active and Energy Conservation Functions:
    • In this framework, the active function involves supplementary aspects that introduce new technologies or methods to replace outdated or less effective solutions. This function is about direct enhancement through substitution or upgrade, pushing the boundaries of what is currently possible.
    • The energy conservation function consists of complementary aspects that support or stabilize the enhancements introduced by the active function. This includes all the processes, systems, or technologies that help integrate new solutions into the existing framework, ensuring they operate efficiently and sustainably without disrupting the core functionalities.

  3. Gravitational Force and Catalyst:
    • The gravitational force in this context refers to the inherent ability of the technological solution to address and solve fundamental weaknesses or problems within the existing system. This force draws the system towards adopting new solutions by highlighting their effectiveness in overcoming these inherent challenges.
    • The catalyst for introducing these technological changes is the presence of latent needs within the system or organization. These are unmet or emerging demands that the current setup cannot adequately satisfy, prompting the exploration and adoption of innovative solutions that can meet these needs more effectively.

By considering these elements, unicist technological scenarios provide a structured and strategic approach to technological innovation and integration. This approach ensures that new technologies are not just adopted for their novelty but are implemented strategically to enhance specific functionalities, resolve inherent system weaknesses, and satisfy latent needs, thereby optimizing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the organization or system.