Unicist Ontogenetic Maps

Unicist Research: Closing the gap between macro and micro behavior

February 14, 2014 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Binary Actions / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Standard tagged Adaptive Systems Research / Business Scenarios / Country Scenarios / Future Scenarios / Intelligent Systems / ontogenetic intelligence of nature / Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute / Theory of evolution / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Corporate University / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Thinking by Unicist Press Committee

The Unicist Research closed the gap between macro and micro behaviour. The unicist complexity research approach implies dealing with applications while researching, which requires that the lapse of research time be very long in order to achieve fully accurate predicted results before validating a hypothesis.

As it has been done every year since its foundation, The Unicist Research Institute synthesized this January the researches that had been finished until that time. After 38 years, 2013/2014, can be considered the year in which the integration of macro and micro behavior could be confirmed.

The gap between the macro and the micro cosmos has been and is still a problem that theoretical physicists are closing. The integration of the field of macro and micro behavior, that has been solved by Peter Belohlavek, is homologous. It allows integrating social behavior with individual behavior, making human complex adaptive systems manageable.

The publication of Conceptual Economics, Conceptual Anthropology and Conceptual Psychology are some of the milestones of this process that included the researches developed in 2013-2014 (see image above).

You can access Conceptual Economics and Conceptual Anthropology at:
http://www.unicist.org/repo/#Economy

If you want to access the “Drivers of Human Behavior” that explain the structure of human intelligence, please access: www.unicist.org/repo/#Psychology

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm. http://www.unicist.org/repo/#Unicist

Ideologies are the restricted context for social evolution

April 26, 2012 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps tagged Country Archetypes / Country Future Research / Ideologies / Political Scenario / Social Evolution / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Approach / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unified Field by Unicist Press Committee

Before the unicist approach, ideologies were considered as the core aspect of the political scenario of a culture that sustained the ethics of the governmental and social actions.

The unicist approach to evolution integrated ideologies both at an individual and social level considering that they might be absolute or functional and that their evolution is driven by technologies. A change of technologies is needed to foster the evolution of ideologies.

“Ideologies are necessary to provide a secure framework of ideas to human beings to deal with their adapting processes to the environment and its changes. Ideologies sustain human actions in the individual and social fields.

Thus, we found two different ideologies that regulate, on the one hand, the individual behavior, and, on the other hand, the social behavior.

The nature of a personal ideology can be described as the integration of the individual’s social ideology and the individual ideology to define the role of the person in the society.

The social ideology is the mask that covers the inaccessible archetype of the culture while the individual ideology is the mask that covers the ethical intelligence of an individual.

Ideologies make the development of individuals’ role in the society possible. Ideologies work as short-cuts, in which the individual has no real awareness of his own archetype or of his individual predominant type of ethics. Therefore, when the functionality of ideologies is replaced by absolute ideologies, this frequently drives to self-fulfilling prophesy.”

Access it at:
www.unicist.com/books-pages/en/nature_ideologies1.php
First you need to register: www.unicist.com

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. https://www.unicist-school.org/theoryofevolution/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/turi.pdf

What are Ontogenetic Maps?

October 6, 2011 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy / Unicist Tweetinar tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

The integration of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature, the anthropological invariables and human ontointelligence made the development of the ontogenetic maps possible.

These ontogenetic maps are timeless meaning that they are valid as long as the function they represent exists.

For example, the ontogenetic map of a lifeboat exists and remains unchanged as long as its function exists. Technologies change, cultural contexts are different but the ontogenetic map of the lifeboat remains the same.

Ontogenetic maps are cross-cultural because the integration of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature with the anthropological (cultural) invariables defines the nature of a function in synthetic language.

On the one hand, this makes the unicist ontological structures self-evident in any culture and, on the other hand, it makes the ontological algorithms, that define the ontogenetic maps, be perceived as logical because they follow the natural way something needs to be developed.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became the major research organization in the world in the field of human adaptive systems. More than 4,000 unicist ontological researches were developed since 1976 until July 2011 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution. They included the development of the unicist ontogenetic maps (DNA) of institutions.

Researching Adaptive Systems is an Adaptive Process

July 31, 2011 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Object driven Technologies / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Process Management / Unicist Strategy / Unicist Tweetinar tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

The research and design of complex adaptive systems requires adapting to the different application fields.

Therefore the semantics of the ontological structure has been defined using different wording for the homologous ontogenetic structure.

Logical approaches have been developed to solve specific problems. Researching and designing human complex adaptive systems implies the use of a new logic.

Unicist logic has been developed to deal with complexity and integrates preexisting logical approaches in their oneness.

The learning of the reading of unicist ontologies and unicist logic is strongly recommended when entering the field of researching human complex adaptive systems.

The understanding of the ontology of “biological entities” helps to follow the laws of nature when dealing with genetic engineering processes and use it to apprehend the nature of beings with “artificial life” such as institutions.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 4,000 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until July 2011 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.

The Ontological Functionality of Myths in Social Evolution

June 3, 2011 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Object Driven Organization / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Process Management / Unicist Standard / Unicist Tweetinar tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by admin

Myths guide cultures providing a short path for actions and a framework of shared social fallacies to avoid the perception of their weaknesses.

Therefore myths include “true” and “false” aspects. The first ones to guide actions and the second ones to hide the weaknesses that are not functional to the culture.

It can be said that laws work as myths in a culture. Laws establish a way to behave and implicitly hide all the dysfunctional aspects of the society.

From an essential operational point of view it can be said that myths are integrated by short-paths that provide a solution, the freedom is given by the automated behavior that allows intuitive actions, the security is provided by the values shared by the society and the weaknesses are covered by shared social fallacies that work as fallacious myths.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering complexity science research organization developing solutions for complex adaptive systems using ontogenetic ontologies and object driven technologies. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.

Fundamentals of the Research of Complex Systems

March 15, 2011 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Objects / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Process Management / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

To do research on the structure of complex systems, through the knowledge of concepts that regulate them, is probably one of the most difficult tasks when developing methods of fundamental analysis.

The essences cannot be observed and therefore one part of the research in based on logical inference with validation in its application in the real world.

Only operative concepts can be forged and that is why these certainly belong to the world of sciences.

Functional concepts include laws of evolution that go beyond systemic sciences and which belong to the world of complexity sciences. It is easier to research the extrinsic concepts than the intrinsic ones.

Extrinsic concepts can be validated through observable experiences. Instead, intrinsic concepts can only be validated through the forecast of their behavior, the measurement of the actual behavior occurring and the validation of the conceptual structure when there is a total certainty of such forecast.

That is why the research of intrinsic concepts requires an extreme amount of “chronological” time.

See the unicist complexity research framework:
http://unicist.org/ucu-en/unicist-research-framework-for-human-adaptive-systems/

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,500 researches, until September 2010, in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Ontology of Evolution.

Ontogenetic and phylogenetic evolution of ideologies

February 25, 2011 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

It is accepted that ideologies evolve with the evolution of institutions, communities and cultures. It is self-evident when learning from the history of the evolution of countries.

What is not so self-evident is the fact that ideologies evolve with the evolution of individuals.

1)      In their childhood the dominant ideologies are “individualistic”.
2)      Adolescence drives to sharing with the group of colleagues which demands a “socialist” ideology.
3)      Youth is the time of extreme exertion of power which drives naturally to a “paternalistic” ideology.
4)      Finally, maturity implies minimizing the energy consumption which drives to “pluralism” meaning the understanding that multiple beliefs are functional to different goals.

Democracy is the functional integration and cohabitation of the ideologies according to the interests that need to be covered and the technologies that are available

It can be defined that “childhood” and “adolescence” require defensive ideologies while “youth” and “maturity” allow the use of expansive ideologies.

Defensive ideologies are the basis for minimum strategies while expansive ideologies define the maximal strategy.

In a mature democratic culture all these ideologies coexist.

Peter Belohlavek

Unicist Fundamentals of the Power of Nations

January 16, 2011 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Objects / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Process Management / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

The Power of Nations integrates the Economic, Social, Diplomatic and Dissuasion Powers to sustain the power of the culture that is within its archetype.

Subsistent and surviving archetypes have more need for dissuasion power than expansive and influential cultures.

All cultures need to integrate all the aspects: economic, social, diplomatic and dissuasion powers. But each culture needs to do it based on its values, in a way that is natural for the culture.

The integration of all these aspects is what generates the power of a Nation that works as a gravitational force for all the activity within the Nation and with the environment.

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Peter Belohlavek

The roots of the involution provoked by human action

August 16, 2010 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Objects / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Process Management / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

The most obscure aspect of human behavior began to be unveiled when the superiority complex was discovered.

Now, we can say that the picture of human behavior has been completed with the discovery of the ontology of human complexes. It has been demonstrated that complexes have individual and social components that are homologous.

The discovery that the basic personal complexes are the Inferiority / Superiority complexes and the Oedipus complex made human conceptual behavior predictable.

The social complexes were defined as the Self-valuation syndrome and the Evolutionary syndrome which are homologous to the previously mentioned complexes.

This allowed integrating the functional and dysfunctional aspects of human behavior in the Unicist Standard.

The obscure part of individuals is very difficult to apprehend because one needs to be able to get in touch with one’s obscure part. It may provoke reaction, denial or rationalization. But it is extremely useful in the long run. Evolution implies: today better than yesterday.

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Theory of Evolution.

Frequently asked questions on the Theory of Evolution

July 15, 2010 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Binary Actions / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Object Driven Organization / Unicist Objects / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Ontology / Unicist Ontology of Evolution / Unicist Process Management / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy tagged Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Diego Belohlavek

What is a Complexity Science Research?

The complexity science research is the research of the ontological structures and the taxonomies of adaptive systems.

The Unicist Standard for complexity research was developed based on the characteristics of adaptive systems considered in their complexity, some of their characteristics are:

1)      Open boundaries
2)      Biunivocity of its components
3)      The existence of conjunctions without disjunctions
4)      The inexistence of observers

It differs from systemic research because it needs to be part of a real, non-simulated, functioning adaptive system. It does not allow making artificial experimentation.

Applicative research ends with the definition of the Unicist Standard.

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

Access a Free Trial:

If you would like to receive monthly information on this blog, please register here.